To read this page in Deutsch, Francaise, Italiano, Portuguese, Espanol, copy and paste the complete URL("http://www.g21.net/drug19.html") and enter it in the box after you click through.
Event #133: Not Your Grandfather's Web Magazine.
THE FIRST TIME: A reader shares his story.
G21 SPORTS: KO is back with the second of his NFL predictions for this season. This week: THE NFC.
POWERSBOOKS: BOB POWERS reviews a new tome by EKNATH EASWARAN, GARY WEBB's "Dark Alliance", and "C'mere, Kitty" by ALAN KATZ.
ON DRUGS: ADAM SMITH challenges the law of the land in "One in Thirty-Five."
DAY ONE: TODAY: ROD AMIS on Real Love.
SEA OF DREAMS: We have a winner! The first winner of ZenCyn's Dream Interpretation Contest is featured.
DON'T READ ME FIRST! Our Publisher gives the skinny on our largest weekly kick-off ever. HOT LINKS(Not From Louisiana): RADIO RAHEEM expands our Link Partners Program, by welcoming new Partners from around the globe.
LAST WEEK's EDITION For rapid response, use The Message Board |
At what point, exactly, does a society qualify as a police state?
In 1972, there were approximately 200,000 incarcerates in the U.S. Today that number is fast approaching 2 million. And the prison boom continues. Has any of this made drugs less available to our kids? Has it forced up the price of cocaine? Driven down the purity of the heroin that is sold on our streets? No. In fact, by any of these indicators drugs are far more available today than they have ever been. In fact, we can't even keep them away from the people whom we've locked up, as drugs run rampant throughout our prisons.
One in 35. And that doesn't even tell the whole story. If that number were further broken down, we'd find that the proportion of American males under supervision is more than one in twenty, of African American men, more than one in nine, and of young African American men, more than one in three. And apparently, our esteemed leaders are not done yet.
During the 1996 Presidential campaign, Republican nominee Bob Dole took President Clinton to task for being "soft on drugs."
When is it enough? How many people do we have to imprison to "win" the drug war? One in twenty-five Americans? One in twenty? One in ten? In cities such as Washington, DC, fully half of all young African American men are "in the system." But Washington is not "drug free". Nowhere near. Will two out of three do it? Three out of four? All of them?
Is there no other way for an ostensibly free society to deal with the issues surrounding substance use and abuse? Is it, as our leaders would have us believe, the responsible thing to do: criminalizing personal choice and addiction, creating black markets which are not only criminal in their own right but which also drive up rates of property crime in service to artificially inflated prices, teaching our children that the way to a safer society is to continue to raise the number of people in cages? Have we, as a society, decided that gulags are preferable to the vagaries and pitfalls of liberty?
Today, in America, the land of the free, one in every thirty-five adults is either in prison or jail, on probation or parole. Our leaders scoff at the efforts of other nations to find non-punitive ways to deal with their drug problems, calling them "irresponsible" and "disastrous." But what is the adjective to describe our own transformation into a nation of jailers? Would the great leaders of our past, Washington, Jefferson, Lincoln, Frederick Douglas, John F. Kennedy, Martin Luther King, believe that mass incarceration was the appropriate response to our current problems? To any problem of which they could conceive? Would the leaders of today have the courage, the gall to look any one of those great men in the eye and explain to him why this is the course we have chosen for America? One in thirty-five... and rising. Now tell us, mighty drug warriors, where do we go from here?
+++ The Previous ON DRUGS +++
Copyright, 1998, GENERATOR 21.
Our Editor does listen!