Generator 21 masthead. COVER -> MEMOIRS OF THE INFORMATION AGE
A spaceholder

THREE QUESTIONS: G21 Interviews Tom Mangan

To read this article in Deutsch, Francaise, Italiano, Portuguese, Espanol and not English, copy and paste the complete URL("http://www.g21.net/mem32.html") and enter it in the box after you click through.

Tom Mangan works for the San Jose Mercury News, the Silicon Valley newspaper acclaimed for its overall reporting and especially its technology coverage. But Tom is also the publisher and motive force between SevenQuestions.com, a site which has won acclaim for its interesting and often surprising interviews. G21 decided to turn the tables on Tom and interview him about his Web project. We promised to only ask three questions.

G21: What inspired you to start the SevenQuestions.com Web project?

TOM MANGAN: I had three things every online impresario needs: time on my hands, free content and a trusty source of surfers.

After I had moved to Silicon Valley in September 1999 to take a job at the San Jose Mercury News, I spent a few months getting the lay of the land, finding out where all the restrooms and gas stations are, etc.

Along around November I started getting the Web itch again (I've been at this since October 1996) and decided the most expedient way to start a new site would be to resume the SevenQuestions project, a series of interviews I had done in 1998 with working journalists I had met while developing a site called "Newsies on the Web," which had links to journalists' Web sites and other stuff of interest to journalists. The plan was to send out a mass mailing to all the people I'd interviewed before seeking fresh volunteers, and set out in search of new people to interview outside the news business.

As for the ready source of surfers, one of the guys I interviewed for the original SevenQuestions was Jim Romenesko, of Media News fame. He had a link to my old site at his Media Gossip page, so I figured right off the bat his link would drive a few people to my new page, they'd tell a few people and by word of mouth it'd catch on.

My primary thought was to interview anyone who seemed seemed to have interesting stories to tell -- friends, family, co-coworkers -- anybody whom I could ask smart questions about because I knew where to look. The only weakness is the interviews would have to be by email, because that's the most efficient way of getting people's words onto a Web page via cutting and pasting. It also narrows the field to people who can write well, so it's not quite a cross section. There's also not much human interplay via e-mail, so I'd generally recommend against it as a journalistic technique.

"Why would any serious journalist waste his time on the Web?"


A space holder.

A space holder.
"Yeah, I could easily solve that problem for you... But what's in it for me?"
The World's Magazine: g21.net

Event # 209: NEW POWER GENERATION


This Pull-down Menu will hyperjump you to all our great features. Try it!

JOIN THE G21 MAILING LIST. Get updates on new features. Take part in our Readership polls, shape the future of The World's Magazine. It's easy! E-mail The World's Magazine with the "Subject" line: SUBSCRIBE.

Want to know more about our community? The Info is here.



LAST WEEK's EDITION


For Deep Background visit the G21-Barnes & Noble Shop

OR get great books at the G21 BARNES & NOBLE SEARCH ENGINE

HOME


Discover the MOIA Discussion List


A space holder.

"Why can't your Web page be more like a video game?"


A space holder.

dubya-dubya-dubya BlowTheDotOutYourAss dot com


Memoirs graphic.

I got lucky in that one of my first interviewees was a former L.A. Times reporter who had some pretty cutting comments about the Times/Staples Center fiasco -- so I sent a link to Romenesko, he posted it and that essentially launched the site.

Eventually, the net widened considerably and I started getting many more people in varied fields with wildly diverging interests. My most popular interview is with a professional pilot and amateur archaeologist who digs up the sites of former outhouses and finds all sorts of interesting gems, mostly old medicine bottles but occasionally toys and other relics from the days before indoor plumbing.

I never really knew what I was doing beyond interviewing people via email until I had about 50 or so posted (there's 60-plus now). In the course of asking a visitor's question about who gets interviewed it dawned on me what I had been doing: finding fascinating characters who might have interesting things to say if only they'd been asked. The point of my site is, I ask.

G21: Why do you think we "newsies" often fail to get it right in our interviewing process?

TOM MANGAN: I can't speak for my brethren on the reporting side because I've always worked as a copy editor and a designer. Heck, usually when I call an editor or reporter with a question on a story I'll find that they have already asked the same question but found the answer simply wasn't available. So, most of the time the interviews get it right, to tell the truth.

The main thing I find is that if I ask informed questions, I get interesting answers. That means doing your homework, particularly when you're dealing with people who leave an extended trail of online breadcrumbs. Don't ask people for information that's widely available already -- it's a waste of your time and theirs.

Some interviews -- like going to the mall and sticking a camera in someone's face -- are doomed to mediocrity from the get-go because the questioner knows nothing about the person being interviewed, who in turn never has no meaningful answers. If ever a reporting technique was a candidate for being jettisoned from the airlock, this is it.

And there's the obvious case made by my site: interesting people are all over the place (particularly online), but you'll never pry their stories out of them if you don't do your homework, win their trust and ask the things they can answer well.

So, why do they get things wrong? Mostly because there are so many things standing in the way of them getting it right: some of it their fault -- ignorance, lack of curiosity, poor preparation -- some of it structural -- deadlines, available newshole, lunkheaded editors -- and some of it the breaks of the game -- if you don't find the person who says just what you want to say, well, they're not going to say it in your story.

It's hard to do this well and easy to screw it up.

G21: Various people, including your interviewee Jules Siegel, have complimented you on the design of your personal (resume') site. What would you advise other people designing for this medium to focus upon?

TOM MANGAN: Well, this is sort of akin to asking a soapbox derby winner for tips on winning the Indy 500. Best I can say is never settle for anything less than clean, polished design. That means hiring talent who really know how to make your content shine by matching it with the proper medium -- a musician's site has to have music files, an animator's site has to have animations. You've got to have the basics with as few distractions as possible.

This is as far as I'd prefer to go here because everyone who makes an honest living designing web sites is doing a far better job than I -- and I think I've earned a measure of their respect (to the extent they know I exist, of course) by trying to ensure that my reach isn't beyond my grasp.



TAKE THE RISK OF INVOLVEMENT.

A space holder.


g21.net The World's Magazine



You can watch history...
or make it.


A space holder.



Meet the new Boss...





MEMOIRS OF THE INFORMATION AGE ARCHIVES

THE PREVIOUS MEMOIR

THE NEXT MEMOIR




+++ Home +++ RECOMMENDED +++

© 2000, GENERATOR 21.

E-mail your comments. We always like to hear from you. Send your kudos, brickbats and suggestions to rod@g21.net.